Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to pay the price of politics in the Middle East
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
RIYADH: Whenever conflicts erupt in the Middle East, American consumer brands are often among the first targets of public anger. The war in Gaza has been no different, with McDonald’s and Starbucks branches in Lebanon attacked and consumer boycotts announced throughout the region. These attacks and boycotts echo similar scenes from the time of the Second Intifada in the early 2000s and the Iraq War era, which prompted a ban on Coca-Cola that remained in place in many Arab countries for decades, giving its rival Pepsi a market advantage enjoyed to this day.
Starbucks Profit Surges on Higher Prices, Improved Operations - WSJ
Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to
Starbucks' Schultz Hints Political Career May Be Brewing - Bloomberg
Even more stores? Not a tall order for Starbucks
Starbucks
Israel-Hamas War Leads to Boycotts of Multinational Brands
Ranked: The Most Popular Fast Food Brands in America
McDonald's and Starbucks among major US brands boycotted in Middle
As Starbucks unionizing slows, some strike, others skeptical
de
por adulto (o preço varia de acordo com o tamanho do grupo)
